Rechercher par propriété

De Remix Biens Communs
Aller à :navigation, rechercher

Cette page fournit une simple interface de navigation pour trouver des entités décrites par une propriété et une valeur nommée. D’autres interfaces de recherche disponibles comprennent la page recherche de propriété, et le constructeur de requêtes « ask ».

Rechercher par propriété

Une liste de toutes les pages qui ont la propriété « Texte de la note » avec la valeur « A process where inspaniduals with the same interests potentially form a group, and pursue these interests and gain forms of value from within their group by working collectively and agreeing upon decisions that are harder to make in a group. ». Puisqu’il n’y a que quelques résultats, les valeurs proches sont également affichées.

Affichage de 6 résultats à partir du nº 1.

Voir (50 précédentes | 50 suivantes) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

Liste de résultats

    • Collective Action  + (A process where individuals with the same interests potentially form a group, and pursue these interests and gain forms of value from within their group by working collectively and agreeing upon decisions that are harder to make in a group.)
    • Collective Action  +
    • Commoning  + (Commoning is the subjective process involved in ‘making common’. It is the collective psychological shift implicit in establishing a commons.)
    • Tactical Chartering Manifesto/Social and Physical Space Assessment  + (First sentence pertains ONLY to degradatioFirst sentence pertains ONLY to degradation, but there a conditions within the commons that can be in a good state, so preservation becomes the desired outcome. Make sure to generalize this specific term of this task...</br> </br>Each sub-chapter should be more focussed on what than why : what is (or should be "Assessing the physical aspect of the space" rather than why " there was a reason to voice concern"</br> </br>You're right... I will add some sentenses on what this process is.</br> </br>the "why" should be in another chapter (probably before) that explain the reasons and the principles of the tactical chartering </br> </br>I agree with this point. This will take some time to reorganize...</span>ill take some time to reorganize...</span>)
    • Traditional Knowledge License  + (Traditional Knowledge (TK) Licenses In 200Traditional Knowledge (TK) Licenses</br>In 2008, we began developing the TK Licenses concept. Inspired by Creative Commons (https://creativecommons.org/) and in conversation with Indigenous communities, our goal was to develop a new and complimentary set of licenses that addressed the diversity of Indigenous needs in relation to intellectual property. This work received funding from IPinCH (https://www.sfu.ca/ipinch/) and WIPO (http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/) and was part of the original NEH grant funding to develop Mukurtru CMS (http://mukurtu.org/) for Indigenous digital content management.</br>Ongoing collaboration with our partner communities showed that the immediate concern was around negotiating and managing cultural heritage material where Indigenous individuals or communities did not hold the copyright. Instead third parties like researchers and institutions were the legal rights holders. With this focus, we developed a set of TK Labels. The Labels are an educative and non-legal intervention addressing the enormous amounts of Indigenous cultural heritage material that circulates without Indigenous perspectives or protocols regarding fair and equitable circulation and use. We currently have 4 TK Licenses in development and we continue to refine these for future use. For an example of customized TK Licenses see the Canning Stock Route Project. See http://mira.canningstockrouteproject.com/ http://mira.canningstockrouteproject.com/)
    • Tactical Chartering Manifesto/ Objectives to Tactical Chartering  + (should be clarified. Seems to me too vagueshould be clarified. Seems to me too vague</span></br></br>I wanted to emphasize that tactical chartering should be a fair process that allows people (from whatever situation they come from) to participate, vote, and be involved </br></br>yep. I agree. I think we need to find some words more clear for that because democracy should be "always" participative or should always involved the people, no ? </br></br>Maybe something like "equitable participation"? This will require some thought... But yes you are right about this</span></br>perhaps, it will be better to separate the 2 ideas : participation (involvment) and democracy (justice and equity) ? </span></br></br>To be based on participation processes .... bla bla bla </span></br></br>2) To be developped with pluralism and solidarity approach (or principle) </span></br></br>What do you think of participatory action research? </br></br>This is a good idea, I will look for some literature that explains this clearly and thoroughly. "Solidarity Approach" is a perfect way to explain what I was trying to say here, I like it very much...ect way to explain what I was trying to say here, I like it very much...)